Thursday, December 3, 2009
58. The Beatles - Rubber Soul (1965)
Track List: Drive My Car // Norwegian Wood //You Won't See Me //Nowhere Man // Think For Yourself // The Word // Michelle // What Goes On // Girl // I'm Looking Through You // In My Life // Wait // If I Needed Someone // Run For Your Life
The first in a long run of landmarks. The Beatles! The Who! The Byrds! It's going to be a big couple of days here at the blog.
After a few false-starts and a lot of good singles, the Beatles finally come into their own as album artists. Everything about this record, from the production to the song-writing and the inventive instrumentation (acoustic guitars, sitars, and even a box of matches), is a step-up not just for the band but for the rock genre in general. Of course, all this means is that rock and roll is no longer quite so far behind pop as it once was, but that's really just praising with faint damnation. This is impressive stuff!
I mean, just look at the artwork - the four boys, no longer quite so nice-looking, and with their features all twisted and weird against a forest backdrop. The new album is slightly mellow, slightly folky, and more than a little weird - and the cover captures all of this perfectly. From the unspeakably pretty "Norwegian Wood"(which helped introduce the sitar into Western pop), to "Nowhere Man" - the first non-lovesong the Beatles wrote, and one of their most depressing - and the pretty little wedding favourite "In My Life", there's a lot of great stuff here.
Of course, it isn't all good - it's a rare Beatles album that doesn't have at least one stinker on it, and this time out we have a couple of doozies. "What Goes On", anyone? Unbearable, tuneless country. "Oh, but that's a Ringo song," I hear you say. "It doesn't count". Well then, how about the admittedly more tuneful misogyny of Lennon's "Run Fer Yer Life"? It'd be a great song, if not for John's threatening to murder his girlfriend if she even so much as thinks of leaving him.
Is this a masterpiece? No! But it is a landmark in pop music, and a very nice listen (even if it does reek entirely too much of pot). And (thank God) things only get better from here.
B+
Thursday, August 6, 2009
54. B.B. King - Live at the Regal (196
Traxx:
1. Every Day I Have the Blues 2. Sweet Little Angel 3. It's My Own Fault 4. How Blue Can You Get 5. Please Love Me 6. You Upset Me Baby. 7. Worry, Worry 8. Woke Up This Morning (My Baby's Gone) 9. You Done Lost Your Good Thing Now 10. Help the Poor
Review:
Right. I've got to go into town to return a library book and get my phone fixed, so let's keep this quick. I think the last blues album we had here, Muddy Water Live at Newport, was something that I found initially off-putting but quickly grew to love. B.B. King, on the other hand, is a fellow I found myself liking immediately. He has a great conversational style, taking-on a sort of "Wise old man" approach cross-bred with the Lonely Lady, and doling out a whole lot of (usually sound) relationship advice. He's also a pretty funny guy, in that understated way I always associate with Johnny Cash. And he has lines like "If your woman doesn't do exactly what you ask, don't you go hitting her upside the head - because all that'll do is make her a little smarter; she won't let you catch her next time". Which I found funny. Haha.
Anyway, B.B. King is not just a funny and likable guy, he is (or was -no, is. Holy shit, how is this guy still alive and performing? Forget Robert Johnson, it's obvious that B.B. King's the one who sold his soul) a great musician. He has a remarkably versatile voice, wandering from deep rumbling to smooth crooning and that sort of high, whining style I associate with the Delta. And he is an absolutely amazing guitar player. Unfortunately, he doesn't really let rip on most of these songs, preferring to leave things to his more-than-capable backing band, but wow! When that guy plays a guitar, it stays played. Maybe this is what happens when you rescue a guitar from a fire and then name it Lucille. Is that the secret to great blues playing? I do not know.
Anyway, not only are King and his band firing on all cylinders, the material is damned solid, too. There's everything from straight-up blues to a weird sort of Latin dance number in "Help the Poor". And "How Blue Can You Get", in while King points-out the foibles of a perpetually dissatisfied lover, is just hilarious. It's a spectrum, really.
So, this is a very good album but I'm not going to elaborate upon it because damn it I have to get to the shop.
A
And now, in wonderful static monochrome!
Friday, July 31, 2009
53. John Coltrane - A Love Supreme (1965)
Tracks: Part 1: Acknowledgement // Part 2: Resolution // Part 3: Pursuance // Part 4: Psalm
Review:
I'm coming to this album again for the first time in a long while, now imbued with the perspective that comes from having slogged up through the foothills of this list. It's interesting, having a slightly (albeit, only slightly) expanded knowledge of jazz, to listen through A Love Supreme and appreciate the ways in which Coltrane and his band have pulled-apart bop structures and then reassembled them into something loose and free and very, very beautiful. Kind of Blue was extremely free in its improvising, but the tracks on that album still seemed to hew to the notion of introducing a theme, playing it a few times, and then suddenly wandering off on a free and abstract (albeit, very pretty) jam. Conversely, The Black Saint and the Sinner Lady displayed an awe-inspiring degree of compositional acumen, effectively rewriting the rules of jazz from the ground up.
On A Love Supreme, however, Coltrane seems to have found a balance between the beauty that comes from improvisation and the beauty that comes from adherence to traditional forms, and has hit upon a way of mixing bop with free jazz that is extremely loose and lyrical, and at times rather wild, but which also maintains a great deal of coherency, and progresses logically from album opener to close as though it were one single track (which, I suppose, is a fairly valid way of looking at it). The result is an album which is both highly experimental, and immediately accessible - a gorgeous, swirling mass of cymbals and saxophones anchored by Latin dance rhythms and woven-through with unusual-yet-catchy melodies. It's like watching the waves churn-up foam from the ocean on a cloudy day.
I will admit that there are bits of this album that I don't really like - specifically, the middle section, where the horns and piano die down in favour of some improvisation by the drums and bass. Now bear in mind, I have nothing against drums and bass - I just don't think the solos are all that great. Then again, it does break-up the album, providing some interesting sonic contrasts, and paves the way for the absolutely beautiful "Psalm" to finish with. The tones conjured-up on this album really are gorgeous - it's amazing to think what they acheived with a more-or-less live recording in 1964. It sounds like nothing else on Earth.
I don't adore A Love Supreme (which is odd, because by all rights I should) but at the same time I can't find much to fault it for. It's beautiful, spiritual music that manages to be just abstract enough to be moving, without ever giving-up the rhythms and melodies that make a person listen in the first place. I think this is a classic example of one of those albums where, even if you hate it with every fiber of your being, you will still be a better person for having listened to it (the Ulysses of jazz albums, maybe?). I'm very, very glad that it exists, even if I don't listen to it more. Maybe I should play it more often, and then I'd finally love it as much as every other person on the planet happens to.
Anyway I like it. It's a very pretty sound.
A+
Thursday, July 30, 2009
52. The Beach Boys – The Beach Boys Today! (1965)
Tracks: Do You Wanna Dance // Good to My Baby // Don’t Hurt My Little Sister // When I Grow Up (To Be A Man) // Help Me, Rhonda // Dance, Dance, Dance // Please Let Me Wonder // I’m So Young // Kiss Me Baby // She Knows Me Too Well // In the Back of My Mind // Bull Session with “Big Daddy” // The Girl from New York City
Review:
I like the Beach Boys! And why? Because they were a very good band. They had delightful harmonies, they had oddly-structured melodies, and they weren’t afraid (at least, under the management of Brain Wilson) to throw rock to the wind in favour of big, strange, all-encompassing pop. On this album, they start to move on from Chuck Berry-derived rock & roll and into the realm of Phil Spector, Les Baxter, Burt Bacharach and Bachman Turner Overdrive. Well, maybe not that last one.
I am biased in my fondness for the Beach Boys, in that they were in certain ways the soundtrack to my life. I suppose they are an omnipresence in the Western musical world, but that doesn’t change the deep personal resonance attendant upon listening to my granddad sing “Barbara Ann” to my sister while setting her on his knee. Nor can in tarnish the memory of solving year five maths problems to the sounds of “Surfin’ USA”, punctuated at regular intervals by the intonations of the voice actor declaring the sums and how long we had in which to get them right. And looking about at the current Indiescape, with its ten thousand bands all desperate to resurrect Surf’s Up, one can only feel a sense of vindication coupled with a deep and penetrating weariness. Move on, you jerks! I want it all for myself. I own “Wind Chimes” to the depths of my jealous heart.
Putting this aside, this is quite a good record. “Help Me, Rhonda” is very beautiful. The first half of the album boasts up-beat pop numbers, all of them extremely enjoyable, while the second half veers into nostalgic melancholia that would come to define the best of the band’s later work. If I am correct (and I’m probably not) this is the album where Brian Wilson locked himself away in the studio and decided he’d tour no more. Even if this wasn’t actually the album where he did it, such was a bold and well-chosen move that would send deep quivers down the spine of the pop-sonic landscape.
If I wanted to say something beyond the vague ululations of reminiscence, then I would declare that “Do You Wanna Dance” is a kick-ass bit for dancing, what with the explosion of the chorus*; that “When I Grow Up (To Be A Man)” asks some hard questions and has some soft melodies; that “Dance, Dance, Dance” has a kick-ass riff and a nice descending melody; that “Please Let Me Wonder” is so delicate and pretty as to be heart-breaking; that the same goes doubly so for “Kiss Me Baby”, which is almost painfully beautiful; and that “She Knows Me Too Well” basically invented the 1970s (ABBA, the Carpenters, Chicago... ain’t nothin’ wrong with that).
It’s not Pet Sounds, but then what is? What this is is very, very good.
A golden victory for squares in the realm of pop.
8.5/10
*the Ramones did it better.
Friday, June 19, 2009
51. Otis Redding - Otis Blue: Otis Redding Sings Soul
Tracks: Ole Man Trouble // Respect // Change Gonna Come // Down in the Valley // I've Been Loving You Too Long // Shake // My Girl // Wonderful World // Rock Me Baby // Satisfaction // You Don't Miss Your Water
Analysis:
I must ask myself the following question – What does Otis Blue: Otis Redding Sings Soul mean to me? It’s no good blathering on endlessly about formal developments that could easily be pinpointed by a visit to Wikipedia. Rather ask – do I like this album? And the answer is yes. Do I love it? No, maybe not. And here I must show my work.
Otis Redding presents probably the most mature, fully-developed soul album yet enlisted. His unique and influential voice – woody and raw, yet capable of great emotional expressiveness and feats of technical daring – is contrasted with impeccably played and produced Stax-brand™ Memphis soul to give the world something peculiar in the realm of pop music. There is little doubt that this is pop music, you see – and it is infectious pop music at that. Redding, Isaac Hayes and Booker T. & the MGs combine forces like some sort of soul-powered Voltron to lend the magical, horn-laden, bronze-coloured touch to such songs as “My Girl”, “You Don’t Miss Your Water” and “A Change is Gonna Come”. In the case of “My Girl”, they even manage to better one of my absolute favourite songs! And then they switch around, take the ferocious rock of the Stones’ “I Can’t Get No Satisfaction”, and turn it into a wailing, lunatic soul-stomp extravaganza. And then they do straight-up blues on “Rock Me, Baby!”. There really are a lot of covers on this album, but they’re all quite successful, so it’s not something to complain about. And, as opposed to what was the case with all of those Beatles and Stones albums, here the covers selections are well-chosen and used purely to augment a selection of equally brilliant originals – including the very first version of “Respect”! Granted, the Aretha Franklin version is better, but most things come-up short in such comparisons.
The interplay of a host of different elements is really what makes this album work. I think someone described this album as a “dictionary of soul”, and you really couldn’t come-up with a better term for it than that. Every song on the album is unique in style, and yet, everything comes-out sounding like Otis Redding. Of course, a great deal of credit for the success of this album rests with the band, but Redding’s voice is another key element in the album’s success. It’s not really the sort of voice I’d tend to favour – a sort of wild, raving voice that tends to wander off into gospel-esque, lunatic frothings and manic-depressive asides – but when buried in amidst the rock-solid playing of the MG.s it creates the perfect contrast. This is the sort of thing Al Green would do very well in the 1970s, playing his strange little voice off against these immaculately-assembled backing tracks. Add to this the fact that Otis Redding is, unlike someone like Mariah Carey, actually credible as a performer as well as a technician and, well, it’s enough to convert even this finicky old grouch (I am actually only 23). Granted, it gets a bit much when he starts rambling about biology in “Wonderful World”, but what are you gonna do?
To many people, this is the greatest soul album of the 1960s, if not of all time. I don’t know if I agree with that assessment, but then I’m hardly qualified to judge. It’s certainly brilliant, however – not a bad track on it, all performed wonderfully. A unique sound that proved influential on generation after generation of recording artists... Fun party jams like “Down in the Valley” following the mournful introspection of “A Change is Gonna Come”, and not a seam showing... What more could you ask from in an album? Well, maybe the ranting on “You Don’t Miss Your Water” could go – because damned if that isn’t just embarrassing. Oh, also this album does not contain a single song as good as “Having a Party” or “Lost Someone”. There, I said it.
A word on formats, however – This is available in a 2 CD set featuring mono and stereo mixes. Unlike The Piper At the Gates of Dawn, which sounds great in stereo and terrible in mono, or Pet Sounds, which sounds amazing in both, this is very much an album that should be heard in monophonic presentation. I’m sure someone could make a decent stereo mix out of this, but that someone apparently isn’t the Rhino Entertainment Company.
9/10
Download:
Otis Redding - My Girl
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Bob Dylan – Bringin It All Back Home (1965)
Tracks: Subterranean Homesick Blues // She Belongs to Me // Maggie's Farm // Love Minus Zero/No Limit // Outlaw Blues // On the Road Again // Bob Dylan's 115th Dream // Mr. Tambourine Man // Gates of Eden // It's Alright Ma (I'm Only Bleeding) // It's All Over Now, Baby Blue
Analysis:
Another side of Bob Dylan, with the man this time trading-in his folksy raconteur persona for equal parts rock-freak and philosophical balladeer. Since these two qualities were given a side each on the old vinyl, I might as well discuss the whole affair in two parts.
Side A:
The album opens with “Subterranean Homesick Blues”, which is just a great song – a weird, surrealistic torrent of 1960s fringe-culture wrapped around a pounding blues-rock beat that just EXPLODES from the speakers like something in the process of exploding. Skipping-out on conscription; brewing-up acid in the basement; shady dealings in back streets; living in clapped-out tenements; hippy jerks. It’s just such a cool song, really, encapsulating most of what people think they know about the 1960s in America, while at the same time being cynical enough about it to avoid falling into a Ginsbergian transcendentalist bullshit-fest. Makes sense that the Weathermen would swipe a line from it.
The cynicism of the opening song carries through the album, and it’s probably the most appealing thing about it. A lot of people take this as the album where Bob Dylan gets well-and-truly fed-up with all the god damned hippies and the counterculture movement in general and just said “Damn it man I’s a-gonna do my own thing”. And really, in makes sense. “Maggie’s Farm” has Dylan quipping that he “ain’t gonna work on Maggie’s farm no more”, and delivering the rather pointed observation that
Well I try my best to be just like I am
But everybody wants you to be just like them.
They say “sing while you slave,” and I just get bored;
I ain’t gonna work on Maggie’s farm no more”.
It’s a pretty good touchstone for anyone who’s ever gotten fed-up with the sort of bullshit, pseudo-intellectual, quasi-political nonsense which infests any gathering of bright young things seeking legitimacy for their anti-establishment railings.
This “Fuck off and leave me alone” vibe carries pretty well in “Outlaw Blues”, which is a fun song but not much of anything to go on about beyond it’s being pretty rocking. Although it does have the great line “Don’t ask me nothing about nothing – I might just tell you the truth”. Oh, and Dylan talks about wishing that he were somewhere on an Australian mountain range, which is something that I feel obligated to mention out of feelings of misplaced patriotism. He doesn’t seem to enthusiastic about the prospect, though, so eh. Anyway, this leads into “On the Road Again”, in which Dylan delineates the various reasons why living in this one place sucks, and why on Earth he should ever desire to stay there, finishing up with the question “You ask me why I don’t live here? I oughta ask why you don’t move!”. It may be a metaphor. And then the side ends-out on “Bob Dylan’s 115th Dream”, which is just a silly song about a silly story, and I don’t really care about it all that much.
Anyway, so side one seems both pretty rocking and pretty mocking, right? Well, I think I said something about Dylan being a burnt romantic, and you get this coming through in the two songs I hadn’t dealt with yet – “She Belongs to Me”, and “Love Minus Zero/No Limit”. These are both very pretty and very delicate love songs which could be pin-pointed as the exact point of origin for every ballad that Tom Waits ever did. In contrast to his rather bitter and isolationist views on politics and such, Dylan still seems quite happy to play the complicated and confusing games of love. I suppose any port in a storm.
Having gotten Side A out of the way, let’s focus on the good stuff
SIGHED BEE
Where the first half of the album is effectively Dylan just playing about with everything-at-the-wall rock music, the songs on side two are something completely new. Delicate folk-inspired music presumably put-in as a consolation prize for his pre-electric fans, this is four songs all over five minutes long, playing with abstract poetical concepts in a way which hadn’t really been done before. “Mr. Tambourine Man” is absolutely beautiful. His voice is beautiful, the guitars strum in these little, hypnotic ways, and the lyrics really are poetry. It’s really just the narrator reflecting on the act of reflection, yearning for some sort of beautiful place outside of anything. It’s probably about drugs, then maybe it’s not.
Then you have “The Gates of Eden”, which, if I were in a symbolical mood, I would argue was a strange rumination on the loss of the American Dream. Then again, that seems to cover 90% of American art, so who knows? I do know that it has an incredible melody, with the vocals climbing up the scale and then dropping down seven semitones and a whole scale (if I’m correct) for a marvellous effect. It’s neat.
Also neat is the opening riff on “It’s Alright Ma (I’m Only Bleeding)”, which is a somewhat terrifying song where Bob Dylan does that thing where he stretches-out the verses for as long as possible, a few bars longer each line, with no real harmonic variation except perhaps for a slight slide up by a semitone or somesuch, before breaking into the hook, and then taking forever to finally get into the chorus, which is a very small and simple “It’s alright ma, I’m only etc...”. It may be apparent at this point that I have trouble explaining the theoretical concepts of music. Which doesn’t matter, because this is a frightening song. The whole thing is underpinned by a bouncy, shuffling sort of rhythm. It’s fascinating, what Dylan does vocally on this track, singing everything behind the beat on the verses and then shifting into a smoother style for the bridge and chorus. Structurally, it’s a marvel. Oh, and lyrically it’s good too, railing against the impossible unpleasantness of modern life, all the hypocrisy and such at present, in a very fiery and worrisome manner. It’s a masterpiece on all levels.
Darkness at the break of noon
Shadows even the silver spoon
The handmade blade, the child's balloon
Eclipses both the sun and moon
To understand you know too soon
There is no sense in trying.
Chipper!
And then the album ends with “It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue”, which is both a much softer song, and a similarly depressing one, this time kind of a break-up song I guess. I suppose it helps to ease the listener out gently, rather than having “It’s Alright Ma” drive them to suicide. After all, if everyone who listened to the album were dead, then how would it get good press by word-of-mouth. Still, it’s sad.
So, a pretty neat album. The first half is quite good, but not necessarily brilliant, while the second half is maybe the most consistently excellent thing Dylan ever did. I liked it! I didn’t at first, but then I did, and there you have it.
So should I bother rating this? What's the point to ratings? The point is that it makes me feel like I've pinned this album and can finally move on with my life.
It's a 9.5/10
Download"
The Gates of Eden.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
49. The Sonics - Here Are The Sonics (1965)
Tracks: Witch // Do You Love Me? // Roll Over Beethoven // Boss Hoss // Dirty Robber // Have Love, Will Travel // Psycho // Money // Walkin' The Dog // Night Time Is the Right Time // Strychnine // Good Golly, Miss Molly
Review:
Well this album is loud. I mean, really loud. Elephant stampedes, air raid sirens and atomic bombs are called to mind. Seriously, parts of this album would leave Guitar Wolf clutching their (his?) ears and moaning; I can only imagine the impact it made in Seattle in 1965. And of course I mean this all in the best possible way. The Sonics play 50s-style rock with a 1970s-style punk mindset, and the result is an album which is almost as hard, groovy and insane now as it must have been back in 1965. The singer can't sing, the band can't really play their instruments, and as a result everything the group has is thrown into a Neanderthal rhythm section and the ability to be as loud, dirty and wild as possible. And did I mention loud? These guys were really loud. L-O-U-D. Louuuuuuudddddddddddddddd
d.
The music itself is mostly just a mix of 1950s standards in the Chuck Berry/Little Richard mode, but it's all elevated to the next level by putting all the emphasis on groove. The version of "Do You Love Me" include here, for example, is the most infectiously propulsive thing on the list up to this point. I can't not dance to it. The version of "Money" is better than the Beatles', and the version of "Walking the Dog" leaves the Stones so far behind it's not even funny. And while the material is mostly shop-worn, the band throw-in a couple of original compositions which are easily the best things on the album. "The Witch" is a bizarre song about, well, a witch and the inadvisability of trying to make it with her, and it has this great stop-start rhythm that goes "BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM!
COZ SHE'S A WITCH!"
Seriously it's like Louis Prima meets the Stooges.
In addition to this you get "Strychnine", which is a weird and wild and feral song about getting your kicks by drinking strychnine, that doesn't quite sound exactly like anything else. Interesting lyrical conceits these guys have - an obvious influence, far down the line, on weirdo punk bands like the Misfits and the Cramps. A welcome addition to the musical lexicon! We'd live in a sadder world without kitschy horror-punk.
Given how cool these two songs are, it's a pity that the only real weak note on the album is an original composition. "Psycho", while not without its charms, is basically just a rewrite of "Do You Love Me" with none of the elements that made it work (although it does boast one really, really cool Can-style drum break). I don't mind it, but it's far below the level of the rest of the album, which is a real pity.
So, there you have it. This isn't great art. The Sonics are puerile, juvenile, atavistic and technically inept - and those are their good points! Seriously, as garage rock goes it'd be hard to better this. You've got the rockin'; you've got the groovin'; you've got the hedonistic abandon of youth... An all in an album that sounds like it was recorded through a cardboard box in a hurricane. Sure, it might get wearying after a while, but the whole album's only thirty-five minutes long! Talk about "purity of vision"! It's amazing what you can do with three chords, a few overloaded amps and a complete disregard for the integrity of your ear-drums.
9/10.
Download: The Sonics - The Witch MP3
Download: The Sonics - Strychnine MP3
Oh, and here's the Cramps doing a pretty good cover of Strychnine, too:
Sunday, April 26, 2009
48. Jerry Lee Lewis - Live at the Star Club, Hamburg (1964)
Tracks: Mean Woman Blues // High School Confidential // Money // Matchbox // What'd I Say Part 1 // What'd I Say Part 2 // Great Balls of Fire // Good Golly Miss Molly // Lewis Boogie // Your Cheating Heart // Hound Dog // Long Tall Sally // Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On // Down the Line
Review:
My complaints about this album are basically the same as those I had about the Little Richard album a while back - yeah, it's fun and all in small doses, but Jesus Christ is this album a chore to sit through. Forty minutes that feels like four hours, in which Lewis slams (and I do mean slams, and with a frequent disregard for whether his backing band can keep with him) his way through a selection of originals and standards. The performance is great, I'll own - Lewis' lunatic speed-freak sexually deviant nature has been well-documented, and it's all on display on this record. This is probably the rawest and most sexual album we've had up to this point. Unfortunately, it's pretty hard to carry an album on rawness alone and, as much as I hate to sound like a whiny 1950s father figure, most of the songs just sort of sound the same - and not in a good, Bo Diddley sort of way. It's good, but I really have to be in the mood for it - and given that lately I've mostly been listening to ambient house and folk music, it's fair to say that I may not be at my most receptive just now.
So, for what it is it's pretty good. Lewis is wild and crazy, his song selection is good, and the Nashville Teens do a great job on the backing tracks. I think my main problem is that the guys seem to favour a "smash and howl" approach where I would generally be more in favour of a chugging groove. "What'd I Say" and "Money" both have neat rhythms, though, and really a lot of the songs have somethng to recommend thems. I tell you this, though - I'd better pick-up the pace, because I'm getting might impatient for the advent of funk music.
So what deep insight do I have to offer into this album? It's really good, but also really wearying. If I were a tipsy German dude sitting in the audience then I bet I would have had the time of my life. As it stands, though, I just.
Don't.
Care.
7/10.
Download: Jerry Lee Lewis - Whole Lotta Shakin' Goin' On MP3
47. Buck Owens and His Buckaroos - I've Got A Tiger By The Tail (1965)
Tracks: I've Got A Tiger By The Tail // Trouble and Me // Let the Sad Times Roll On // Wham Bam // If You Fall Out of Love With Me // Fallin' For You // We're Gonna Let the Good Times Roll // The Band Keeps Playin' On // Streets of Laredo // Cryin' Time // A Maiden's Prayer // Memphis
Review:
Buck Owens looks just like my brother! He really does! My brother is only thirteen, granted, but if 2020 rolls around and his portrait doesn't look just like the one above then I'll eat my genetically-modified space hat. It's really quite uncanny. Whether my brother will then go-on to host a successful revival of Hee-Haw is another matter entirely.
You know what else is weird? The music on this album. Well, maybe not, but I don't really know all that much about country music. I just know what I hate - and I don't hate this. It's a little bit rockabilly, but it's mostly just hard-edged, old-timey hillbilly music. Apparently this was the "Bakersfield Sound", which was a hard-edged reaction against the over-produced "Nashville Sound" that was doing quite well at the time? Apparently. What this all translates into is an album where all the music is quite stripped and raw, with a prominent back-beat and lots of twangy guitars and unadorned, yokel vocals yodelling about how a man's only true friend is his dog. Actually, the lyrics on this album are generally pretty good - nothing spectacular, mind, but they're often quite funny, although not always in a very PC way. For example, "Wham Bham" (and thank you mam), which is basically about exactly what you'd expect something with such a refrain to be about, and "We're Gonna Let The Good Times Roll", which is about a man's baby finally coming home to stay and includes lines about the pair locking themselves in the house and barring the windows and doors. Credit to Mr. Owens - it never quite crosses the line from ridiculous and funny to "weirdly threatening". On the other end of the spectrum, there are songs like "The Streets of Laredo", which is about sad, dead cowboys, and "If You Fall Out Of Love With Me", which comes right after "Wham Bam" and features antithetical lyrics requesting that, if a girl fall out of love with the man, she not let him know about it.
So all in all this is a pretty neat little album. There's a nice bit of stylistic variation between the raw and rockin' tracks and those that boast subtler, fiddle-and-slide arrangements, and Owens himself displays an impressive vocal range that covers everything from deep crooning to a high-pitched "Yeeha!" sort of spruking. I can't really see myself listening to it all the time, but I don't really listen to anything all the time - not even Kate Bush, and I love Kate Bush.
I'm not sure what to say about this. It's very good, but I don't really know enough about country music to offer an intelligent appraisal of it beyond saying "I really like "I've Got A Tiger By The Tail"". Incidentally, I really like "I've Got A Tiger By the Tail". It kind of reminds me of "Everybody's Somebody's Fool" by Connie Francis, although this time around the lyrics are about marrying a troublesome woman. Actually, that's one thing about this album that irks me somewhat - there's a sort of casual, low-key misogyny running through the proceedings, the kind that's never bad enough for it to ruin a friendship, but which is always enough for you to view the friend a little bit askew. Actually, even calling it misogyny might be a bit much. It only pops-up on a few tracks, always in a humorous context, and it's really just more of a bum attitude than anything, and meant in good fun. I don't want to give anyone the impression that this the country equivalent of an N.W.A. album. Although they were probably joking too... Anyway, if I want to avoid getting tangled-up in a web of semantics then perhaps I should just try and avoid saying anything at all. Ignore the last hundred odd words, if you will. This is what happens when you spend four years at university looking for patriarchal subtexts in everything.
Anyway! There you have it. Not a bad album. Apparently it's considered a genre classic, but I wouldn't know. All I know is that, from the small time I've spent with it, I really like it.
8/10
Look at this:
A bit ostentatious, honestly.
Friday, April 17, 2009
46. Dusty Springfield - A Girl Called Dusty (1964)
Tracks: Mamma Said // You Don’t Own Me // Do Re Mi // When the Lovelight Starts Shinging Through His Eyes // My Colouring Book // Mocking bird //Twenty-Four Hours From Tulsa // Nothing // Anyone Who Had A Heart // Twenty-Four Hours from Tulsa // Nothing // Anyone Who Had A Heart // Will You Love Me Tomorrow // Wishin’ and Hopin’ // Don’t You Know
Did you know that Dusty Springfield once punched-out Buddy Rich? Apparently they were on tour together, and he made a snide comment about her being a woman after she had the temerity to ask if she could use his band (which, incidentally, was booked as the shared band) to rehearse. A few hackles raised, a strong word said, and then BAM! That alone makes Dusty Springfield alright in my book.
Anyway, I spent this evening listening over A Girl Called Dusty, and had a very pleasant time with it too. That’s right, not only was Miss Springfield a talented pugilist, she was also one hell of a singer, and she put together a pretty cool album way back when. I think a lot of this has to do with the fact that she had a really good ear for the right material. With A Girl Called Dusty, we finally get a full-fledged, crazily-produced album in the Motown style, and there are quite a few times when the production gets a little off the wall. Thankfully, all the material (with the exception of “My Colouring Book”) is good, all of Dusty’s performances range from fair to excellent, and the insane Phil Spector-ish walls of choirs and drums and strings and horns are often actually a lot of fun, and in the end this is just a really cool soul album. It’s pretty darn good!
Still, it’s kind of a pity that the arrangements are so overboard at times. Even on Dusty in Memphis, which is often praised as the album where Springfield finally realised that she was a good enough singer that she didn’t need to bury herself under layers of arrangements (and which is the only other album of hers that I’ve heard - only $9.99 at JB-HiFi! What a steal! Oh, and I suppose a cassette of one of her disco albums too), there’s still far too many strings and backing vocalists. Can someone tell me if she ever cut and album that was just her and a little four-person blues combo or some such (aside, obviously, from “The Look of Love“)? It seems like it would be something worth hearing.
Which isn’t to say this isn’t worth hearing. “Twenty-Four Hours from Tulsa” is fantastic, what with the big groovy rhythm section and the chorus that just keeps getting bigger - I was OOOOOONLyyyyyy TWENty FOUR HOUrrrssssss froooMMMMM TULLLLSAAAAAAAA!!!! as it were. “You Don’t Own Me” not only has freaking amazing vocals but is just a freaking amazing song - scary, sexy, stern and empowering all at once (somehow). “When the Love Light Starts Shining Through His Eyes” swings so lovely, and the version of “Anyone Who Had A Heart” is all creepy and melodramatic and really good, even if not as good as the original. It sounds, I swear, like nothing so much as early-70s Bowie. “Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow”, however, is one of those clear examples of producers mangling Dusty’s vocals. The backing track on the song is great, and sells the thing as a whole, but then you have Dusty’s vocals piped right into the middle awfully quite as though they’ were being played back via a P.A. system. Very odd. And unfortunate, since Dusty had such a wonderful and versatile voice. I mean, she does big balladeering, and then she turns out and closes the album with a rocking Ray Charles number complete with proto-rapping. The woman had talent! The woman knew how to make a knee turn to jelly. With hair like that, I suppose it would have helped o have been able to sing.
In the end, this is a nice, if not exactly earth-shattering, little album. It’s a very fine bit of African-American pop music being done by a bunch of pasty British people and that, after all, is what the 60s were really about. Yes, forget Kennedy and Vietnam and putting people on the Moon - the 1960s were about the growth in popularity of female British soul singers. I thought everyone knew that. After all, I think the fact that Dusty Springfield inspired Roisin Murphy’s Ruby Blue is at least as important a contribution to world culture as Robert Frost crapping on about his road trip at the Presidential inauguration. I may be wrong, but then I may also be half-asleep. I bet it’s both. I mean, if I can't even remember that the Rolling Stones were suppose to come after this then what hope have I for anything as complex as 20th Century History. Professor Prudence Flowers, your student has failed you.
So this is good. Quite good. The next one is better, though.
8/10
I’m not sure if I’m going to keep putting tracks up for download, since they went and deleted my Genius of Ray Charles entry just the other day on account of the MP3s I mean, I could repost it but I'm really lazy. Then again maybe I can work around it.
As a compensatory gesture, here she is singing a couple of her songs in German:
Thursday, April 16, 2009
45. The Rolling Stones – The Rolling Stones ( 1964)
Tracks: Route 66 // I Just Want To Make Love To You // Honest I Do // Mona
(I Need You Baby) // Now I’ve Got A Witness (Like Uncle Phil And Uncle Gene) // Little By Little // I’m A King Bee // Carol // Tell Me (You're Coming Back) // Can I Get A Witness // You Can Make It If You Try // Walking the Dog
Woo! The Stones dude! Best band ever! Well, maybe not, but they sure were an important one. I guess one of their big contributions was helping rock to evolve as a form, while at the same time keeping it raw and vicious as possible? I guess that’s a good thing, since without them we’d never have had the Stooges or the Velvet Underground, and then where would we be? Well, I guess people who didn’t like glam or alt rock would be alright. Or Neu! and Can. Or, really, half the music on the world today... Personally I’m still hanging-out for the big skiffle revival – I know it’s waiting just round the corner. Any day now! By this point it should be clear that I know nothing at all about the Rolling Stones. Anyway.
I think my favourite moment on this album comes when Mick Jagger cries-out “Sting it, Ben!” on “I’m A King Bee”, only to have someone deliver a little guitar solo that sounds, somehow, exactly like the stinging of a bee. The rest of the song is kind of stupid, what with the goofy lyrics coupled with a complete lack of humour, but that one little part is pretty ace.
This is a pretty neat little album. No-one would ever mistake it for a masterpiece, but once I accepted that it was just an unassuming blues album, I found myself enjoying it quite a bit. It’s basically just an Anglicisation of the Chess Records sound, but there’s nothing wrong with that. The lyrics are generally dumb (in the case of “I’m A King Bee”, they are spectacularly dumb) and the production is really, really cheap, but sandwiched in between those two things are a few pretty neat songs. I’m particularly taken by “Mona (I Need You Baby)”, which is a gritty and groovy Bo Diddley cover with the best vocals on the album, “Can I Get A Witness”, which has a wonderful jumping boogie piano (and was apparently originally a hit for Marvin Gaye), and “Tell Me”, which was apparently one of the first song Jagger and Richards wrote together. Interestingly, in contrast to the rest of the album’s driving blues sound, the song is a quite nice doo-wop influenced number with multi-part harmonies and a jangling acoustic intro. The story goes that Keith and Mick were locked in the kitchen by their manager, and he refused to let them out until they’d written some original songs. I find it amusing that, under such circumstances, they’d churn out something so pretty. It sounds like the sort of thing you’d expect to find on the first Velvet Underground album. Maybe if they’d focused more on originals the whole record could have been this good. Although "Walking the Dog" is pretty cool too, I suppose.
So. In the end I like this. Most of the songs are nothing to write home about, but it’s at least pleasant to listen to (unlike the early efforts of another prominent British blues-rock band of the early 1960s). It’s an interesting little signpost on the road to modern rock music, and it’s enjoyable enough if you have a fondness for such things. I think it’s telling that the best songs here have a big emphasis on the groove. “Tell Me”, “Mona”, “Can I Get A Witness” – all big grooves, you know. Personally, I can’t wait till we finally get around to “Sympathy for the Devil”.
Download: The Rolling Stones - Tell Me MP3
Download: The Rolling Stones - Mona (I Need You Baby) MP3
Fun Facts: “Walking the Dog” was the first Stones song to make it to number one on the Australian charts! And here it is, being performed somewhere other than Australia:
Sunday, April 12, 2009
44. Solomon Burke – Rock ‘n’ Soul (1964)
Tracks: Goodbye Baby (Baby Goodbye) // Cry to Me // Won’t You Give Him (One More Chance) // If You Need Me // Hard, It Ain’t Hard // Can’t Nobody Love You // Just Out of Reach // You’re Good for Me // You Can’t Love ‘Em All // Someone to Love Me // Beautiful Brown Eyes // He’ll Have to Go
Well this is a nifty album. An album that grows on you. Not only is Solomon Burke a great singer, a former undertaker and a Monarch of the Realm, but he’s in possession of that chief virtue of any singer/songwriter – a healthy disrespect for genre conventions. It’s in the title, really – he brings the rock, he brings the soul, and on several tracks he brings a strange, vaguely Cuban hybridisation of the two. You have to love an album that invites direct comparison to Ben E. King, Burt Bacharach and Marty Robbins. Yes, there’s country here too! “Just Out of Reach” is an honest to goodness country ballad. And he covers a Woody Guthrie song! How wonderful is that?
And not only are all these songs really well-performed, but the arrangements are great. The basic core of the group is Solomon, bass, drums, and guitar. The drums are spare but lovely, and you get some neat semi-Latin rhythms on “You Can’t Love ‘Em All”. The bass is... serviceable. It serves the songs great, but it’s never flashy. The guitar, however, is absolutely amazing. You get spiralling, picked rhythms on most of the tracks, all a little bit country, and then you get some ace bluesy noodling on the slow gospel “Someone to Love Me” (which sounds kind of like Otis Redding). This track also features a truly wonderful backing chorus, which is something that pops-up through a lot of the album. Additional elements, such as piano, choir, and the odd bit of brass (and even a woodwind, at one point) are sprinkled liberally through the record, but rather than saturating the songs, they’re used intelligently to augment the recordings. The result is an album which is really very, very well produced. Once again, the most obvious comparison would be Otis Redding, whose Otis Blue, with its stripped-down production, seems to have taken a few pointers from the Solomon Sound. In any case, I really like “Someone to Love Me”. If I have learnt one thing from doing this it is that I have all the time in the world for slow-burn gospel.
So on top of this we have Solomon Burke’s singing, which is pretty great. The guy was apparently a preacher before he became a singer, and the gospel influence is pretty prominent throughout this album. Thankfully unlike Otis Redding (who I will continue to compare him with) Burke doesn’t feel the need to ramble about over his songs with a complete disregard for the rhythm of his backing track. His voice fits with the album perfectly, in that it’s very good while at the same time never flashy for flashiness’ sake.
Unfortunately, there is a downside to all of this. While the album is immaculately put-together, it also suffers from being kind of lacklustre at times in terms of song choices, and in a few instances the tracks are getting by more on the strength of Burke as a performer than of the songs themselves. Still, this actually contributes to the charm of the album – it’s a good, old-fashioned pop album, with no real low-points and the one genuine high in “Cry to Me”. “Cry to Me” was used in Dirty Dancing, didn’t you know? One thing I never understood about the Dirty Dancing soundtrack (and believe me, I am intimately familiar with the Dirty Dancing soundtrack – ah, to be young in the early 90s and have an older sister) is that they used all those old songs to evoke a period feel, and then they dumped-in stuff like “Hungry Eyes”, “The Time of My Life” and Patrick Swayze classic “She’s Like the Wind” (someone was hoping for a chance to audition for the Scorpions). I mean, I like all three of those songs (shut up) but I always thought it a little jarring. Maybe it was meant to evoke the timelessness of the story? In any case, the use of “The Time of My Life” in the climactic dance-party sequence does make thematic sense as a way of pointing towards the exciting new world of the future, without actually having to pay the rights to use a Beatles song. Still...
In any case, this is a pretty neat little album. “Cry to Me” is amazing, “You Can’t Love ‘Em All” has some exceptionally goofy lyrics but sounds wonderful, “Someone To Love Me” is gorgeous and “Just Out of Reach” is a lovely country ballad. I’m also kind of fond of “He’ll Have to Go”, but that has more to do with my Dad have a tendency to burst into loungey renditions of it at inappropriate moments (another favourites of his happens to be “Evergreen” by Barbara Streisand). I wouldn’t call this a masterpiece, but it’s a damned nice listen.
7.5
Download: Solomon Burke - Cry to Me MP3
Download: Solomon Burke - Someone to Love Me MP3
I wish I could dance.
43. Jacques Brel - Olympia 64 (1964)
Tracks: Amsterdam // Les Timides // Le Dernier Repas //Les Jardins du Casino //Les Vieux //Les Toros //Le Tango Funebre// Le Plat Pays // Les Bonbons //Mathilde //Les Bigotes // Les Bourgeois // Jef // Au Suivant // Madeleine
Morbid, sarcastic socio-political show tunes from Belgium, you say? And with theramins? Sign me up! Who knew Lee Marvin was such a talent?
I’d previously only been familiar with Brel’s work in translation, but thankfully this list has forced me to finally face-up to my ignorance and give the original versions a chance. Unfortunately, this resulted in my being a stubborn idiot and deciding that, yes, I know enough French to understand the philosophical paronomasia of an acerbic Belgian. Well, in actual fact I only know enough French to understand one word in five when sung, which resulted in my following along to each song with the lyric sheet in front of me since for some reason my written French is much better than my spoken. And yes, I know that, having gone to all the trouble of looking-up the lyrics in French, I could have just looked-up the English translations, but damn it man it’s the principle of the thing! And if that means that I’m only vaguely aware of what most of “Les Timides” was actually about, then so be it!
(Actually, I did look-up a fair few of the translations, but that’s neither here nor there. I'm actually rather bitter about my bad French - I mean, we had a bunch of Parisian students visit once when I was in year 11, and they all spoke near-perfect English. Most of the people in my French class could barely make it through the play we had to write about trying to order lunch. Although there were those two guys who staged a dazzling rap battle about trying to find a bus station).
So. Jacques Brel. I used to be of the opinion that I vastly preferred covers of the man’s work to the originals, but after seeing Brel give these tunes the live treatment I’ve changed my mind. You see, the emphasis with these songs is quite heavily on the lyrics, and the lyrical trend is for each song to launch the kernel of an idea in the first stanza and then, through each succeeding stanza, work the notion up in greater detail until the whole things reaches a big climax – or anti-climax, depending on the song. So in effect Brel has written a bunch of show-tunes, and he acts them out as you’d expect any cabaret star to do. He works himself into a fervour over the whoring, fatalistic sailors in “Amsterdam”, and he hams it up gloriously as the cretinous suitor in the exquisitely creepy “Les Bonbons”. Then you can almost hear him crying as he sings of “Les Plats Pays” – which is an absolutely astonishing portrait of his home country – and then he minces like a twit in the role of one of “Les Timides”. It’s all brilliantly done, and gave me the sensation of an original cast recording that was far more successful than any such thing could be, given that I wasn’t missing-out (I assume) on the various silly dances.
In any case, my point is that the lyrics on this album are great. “Amsterdam” is a wonderful glimpse into this sort of hellish, beautiful vision of life amongst the mariners, while “Les Toros” is a great song about bullfighting in which the toreadors dream that they’re Garcia Lorca, while the bulls “dream of a hell where deceased men and toreadors will burn”. Anyway it sounds better in French. Then you have not one, but two! ruminations on death in “Le Dernier Repas” and “Le Tango Funebre”, and “Au Suivant”, which is a damned disturbing song about losing ones virginity in the assembly-line of a military bordello (it is a metaphor). Oh, and “Les Vieux”, which is a very sad song about getting old, and “Les Bigotes”, in which the conservatives get their reward “dans le ciel qui n’existe pas”, and then, well, really the whole album is a winner.. The only songs I don’t really like are “Les Jardins du Casino” and “Les Bourgeois”, but then that’s just me. And really it has more to do with their merely being quite good songs on an album jammed full of masterpieces. Allez au diable, vous maudits jardins! Baisez mon ane, vous bourgeois!
Really, this is just a great album. Jacques Brel is often held-up as a pinnacle of Francophone song-writing, and I can certainly see why. You have a man writing truly beautiful poetry, setting it to a great tune, and then performing it all with a vigour and gusto to set your head turning. It’s really excellent. It may be a cliche, but French when used properly is a truly wonderful language, and it’s things like this that make me wish I spoke it better. Well, this and Stephane Mallarme, but I suspect I wouldn’t understand him very well in any case.
Aargh this review is shit but the music is wonderful.Except - Who the hell is Frida the Blonde?
9/10
Look at him go!
He just can't stop!
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Tracks: Hard Day’s Night // I Should Have Known Better // If I Fell // I’m Happy Just to Dance With You // And I Love Her // Tell Me Why // Can’t Buy Me Love // Any Time At All // I’ll Cry Instead // Things We Said Today // You Can’t Do That // I’ll Be Back
Review:
Another year, another Beatles album. This one was the soundtrack to a hit movie! Isn’t that exciting? It isn’t that exciting? Well, I bet that in 1963 the whole thing was pretty damned exciting. In any case I'm going through a "rock" phase at the moment, so if I was ever going to generous to early Beatles then now is the time.
The Beatles have advanced a lot since the last album, even if only in terms of song-writing focus. Meet the Beatles was a bad-to-mediocre affair with a couple of stand-outs. A Hard Day’s Night is a mediocre-to-good album with a few let-downs. It’s all a trade-off, really. The songs are still basic early 60s pop-rock, but that’s not such a bad thing given that the Beatles helped to define the style of the times. And of course the two big singles, the skiffly “Can’t Buy Me Love” and lust-draped title track, are both glorious and show an obvious sort of progression. But then you have the other tracks.
Well, if nothing else they do show variety. You have “I’m Happy Just to Dance With You” and “I’ll Be Back”, two little Shadows-styled numbers the former of which is vastly more enjoyable than the latter, and “Any Time At All”, which is also reminiscent of the Shadows but which somehow manages to both rock hard and conjure visions of Petula Clark. You have “Tell Me Why”, a deliberately goofy Everly Brothers knock-off by way of a game show theme, complete with backing vocals by the rest of the Beatles pretending to be ladies. “If I Fell” is a tepid ballad that sounds like Prudence & Patience cast-off, but much more successful is “And I Love Her” – which has stupid lyrics, but is otherwise a very finely done sort of Country & Western ballad married to a bongo-styled beat and some very nice minor riffs on the chorus. And it’s quite sweet, which is always nice. It reminds me of the ballads of early Zeppelin. And it had woodblocks, of all things! Another neat song is “I Should Have Known Better”, which sounds quite Motown, but which boasts a prominent bluesy harmonica and a decidedly “rock” chorus. And I’ll Cry Instead” is ok too, if only because I have a soft spot for skiffle. Decidedly not OK is “You Can’t Do That”, which boasts an interesting backing track but is let down by utterly abysmal vocals by John Lennon. And I mean truly, unbearably awful. I wonder why they even put this on the album – I mean, there were already 11 songs! Did they really need another one?
It’s this sort of “throw everything at a wall and see what sticks” attitude that seems to be undoing the Beatles at this stage. If this album had ended with “Can’t Buy Me Love” then it’d be a very strong, interesting set of songs. Heck, if the track order had been rearranged a bit so that it didn’t trail of so suddenly, that might have helped too. I suppose this is what happens when you record a side’s worth of A material that made the film, and then decide to pad side 2 with all the songs that weren’t good enough to be in the movie. It’s especially problematic given that the first, good, half is not especially brilliant to begin with. Then again, this can be countered by the fact that, for the first time, the album features only songs written by Lennon and McCartney. The singer-songwriter era is really kicking into gear now, which is a pretty exciting development for all concerned.
So, in the end an important artistic and commercial development on the part of the Beatles, and a pleasant listen for anyone with a fondness for early 60s pop-rock. But that's about it.
7/10
Download: The Beatles - And I Love Her MP3
Monday, April 6, 2009
41. Stan Getz & Joao Gilberto – Getz/Gilberto (1963)
Tracks: The Girl from Ipanema // Doralice // Para Muchuchar Meu Coracoa // Desafinado (Off Key) // Corcovado (Quiet Night of Quiet Stars) // So Danco Samba // O Grande Amore // Vivo Sonhando (Dreamer)
Well this is a lovely little album. A poorly-packaged album, perhaps, what with the tendency for the little information booklet to fall out of its little cardboard flap every time I pick it up (curse you Verve Masterworks!), but the music itself is quite lovely. The two songs that most people probably know from this album are “Corcovado” and “The Girl from Ipanema”, the one a lounge standard and the other a lounge standard that went to number 5 on the Billboard pop charts, but thankfully the rest of the album is pretty good too. This isn’t really surprising, since this album is generally held up as an artistic high-water mark not only of bossa nova, but of jazz in general. That it was also a massive commercial success is just icing on the cake.
So what is the deal behind this album, you ask? Do you really care? Is anyone even reading this? According to my web logs most of my traffic comes from people Googling the album cover of Birth of the Cool. On that note, I’ve earned the right to be glib. Basically, the deal with this album is that Stan Getz, having been bitten by the bossa nova bug back at Jazz Samba, eventually decided to do the next logical thing and collaborate with the inventors of the genre. So we have Antonio Carlos Jobim, both a nifty pianist and the most prominent songwriter in the genre*, and we have Joao Gilberto, the innovative guitarist and singer who hatched the bossa nova rhythm by locking himself in a room for six months and fiddling with his guitar, and they play a clutch of their songs while Getz takes some very lovely solos alongside them. Joining the trio we have Tommy Williams on bass, the awesomely named Milton Banana on drums, and, for two tracks, Joao’s non-professional wife Astrud singing very
The results are of course quite charming. Everyone knows “The Girl from Ipanema”, with it’s little “bim-bom-bim” intro and indelible melody line, but it’s just the highpoint on a uniformly excellent album. (What’s that? You don’t like “The Girl from Ipanema”? Go to hell). The two tracks with Astrud are the stand-outs, but one gets the sense that this was just Stan Getz displaying business savvy in insisting on having a pretty girl sing in English on the two strongest songs. None of the other songs really jump out and slap you in the face with their brilliance, but then that isn’t that kind of album. The melodies are sinuous and subtle, working their way under your skin, and the rhythms just sort of bobble along in this happy little way. Each song starts with a little vocal section, and then you have the solo, and then maybe you have another little vocal packed away in there somewhere. All very nice. As a result, the tracks sort of blend into one another, but if you play any one of these songs by itself its individual genius soon becomes apparent. “Desafinado” is of course marvellous, “So Danco Samba” is just such silly fun, and Stan Getz delivers truly wonderful solos on both this and “O Grande Amor”. In fact, Stan Getz really shines through most of this album – he was already the best thing about Jazz Samba, and he’s obviously just gotten better with time – although if Getz/Gilberto belongs to anyone then it’s definitely Gilberto, who really is a beautiful (albeit very stoned-sounding) singer. Although having said this, Gilberto is all over “Doralice”, and that’s the one song on the album I’ve really not got much time for. O accursed “Doralice” :( Then again, it does stop the album from getting monotonous – if nothing else, Getz/Gilberto is a very well-paced album.
In the end, there isn’t much I can say about this album. The best word to describe it is probably “Charming”. It has such an unassuming quality to it, as though the whole thing were being tossed-off in an afternoon with no thought given to the possibility that it might become a success. “Casual genius”, you might call it – which is probably the defining trait of the genre. The result is an album that sounds like three AM in a swanky nightclub when everyone has left except for you, the band, and the girl that you’re dancing with.
I'm kind of mad that I was wrong about "Agua de Beber" being on this one, though. I love that song.
9.5/10
Download: Stan Getz & Joao Gilberto - O Grande Amor MP3
*incidentally, in the interim between reviewing Jazz Samba and getting around to this, I checked-out a couple of other bossa nova projects. Jobim's album with Elis Regina, Elis & Tom, is really good and definitely recommended. The same goes for Regina's Aquarela de Brasil from 1969, and for Elizete Cardoso's Cancao do Amor Demais from 1958. I also recall Jobim's The Composer of Desafinado, Plays being decent, too, with instrumental versions that are really heavy on the lush strings. I have now exhausted my knowledge of bossa nova completely.
Saturday, April 4, 2009
40. James Brown – Live at the Apollo (1962)
Tracks: Introduction to James Brown//I'll Go Crazy//Try Me//Think//I Don't Mind//Lost Someone//Medley: Please, Please, Please, etc. //Night Train
So now ladies and gentlemen it is Star Time. Are you ready for Star Time? Thank you and thank you very kindly. It is indeed a great pleasure to present to you at this particular time national and international know as the hardest working man in show business...
A little soul, a little jazz, and now we are back round again to soul. Today we are getting down like James Brown. Or with James Brown. James Brown is the man making the music, and we are getting down alongside him in his particular manner. A manner which apparently involves lots of young women shrieking and making lewd, if the audience reaction captured on this recording is anything to go by (and we can only hope). Well can I believe it, too, as this may be the sexiest album ever recorded. And to think that the whole thing almost never came to be! Even though, at the time, everyone knew Brown’s real strength lay in his live act, the man himself was the only guy who thought it might be a good idea to actually record it. In the end, he told his label boss “To hell with you, Syd Nathan; I shall do it myself” and then he went off and recorded the album at his own expense, across three nights at the Apollo Theatre in New York. From that day forth, all sets on amateur night would be limited to no longer than ten minutes each.
Which is to say that this is a pretty great album. A lot of people argue (and their opinions are of course quite valid, though in fact they may be wrong) that this is the very best live album ever put to tape. I don’t know if that’s true, but then again it’s probably irrelevant anyway. If we compare with Sam Cooke (most obvious point of comparison) then we have a less ferocious, and considerably less raw, album here. However, James Brown’s album is by far the better recorded, and this is an important (and good thing) for one very big reason. In a word, James Brown’s band is tight. “Tight” tight. Imagine the tightest band you’ve ever heard, and then imagine it tighter. Do this even if you have heard James Brown’s backing band. His band is actually tighter than his own band. I don’t know how he managed it, but there you are. Possibly he had a gun under his cape. Then again, it’s more probably got something to do all the practice from his insane touring schedule, and the fact that Brown used to fine his musicians fifty dollars for every note they missed. I wonder what effect this approach would have had on a band like say... the Raincoats, perhaps?
The neat thing about the tightness of Brown is that it’s integral to his music. His twelve-piece band is very rhythmic in focus, and every single instrument is coming in right on time, playing a neat little phrase or soloing along perfectly against the beat. At this point James Brown was still the Godfather of Soul, not yet having been appointed Minister of The New New Super Heavy Funk (I believe George Clinton was prime-minister of that particular Parliament); as a consequence, the beats are more of the soul stomp or boogie-woogie variety, and we get a lot more throat-tearing ballads and plaintive crooning than one might expect from the singer of “Hot Pants”. Still, everything is just so damned well-executed. Things start-out slow, with a few nice ballads, then build-up to the insane jazzy groove of “Think” – which is one hell of a song, and makes me think I should be in a car chase in The Blues Brothers. The real strength of Brown as a singer was of course in his sense of rhythm, and he chants and claps hands like a loon across all two minutes of the song. Then we lull again, and the songs start stretching out, and we get a suit of beautiful ballads, the best of which is a full ten minutes long. “Lost Someone” is one of those wonderful songs that is filled with a massive amount of momentum, but which never actually goes anywhere. This may actually be my favourite sort of song, I should note – and in any case, it’s an obvious antecedent to Brown’s later, full-fledged funk (I also suspect Isaac Hayes may have taken a few pointers from this song). The band starts by running through the song as it was released as a single – a beautiful bit of gospel – and then extends the closing refrain seemingly indefinitely, riding on nothing but two gorgeous horn riffs and a six-note bass riff. And then Brown brings the audience in, basically making love to them through his song, asking them to cry “Yeah!” and having the hordes of young girls in attendance scream “YEAH!!!!” back, and every time right on the beat. And even if you are the straightest of men, you will cry "OWE!" and swoon for him when he calls for you to say "Owe". And you will envy the girls he starts singing to specifically. The way these guys – Cooke and Brown – bring the audience in as another instrument is just marvellous. I’ve never heard the studio version of the song but I can’t imagine it coming within a thousand miles of this. Brown almost breaking down into tears, croaking-out his pleas of “I’ll love you tomorrow!” Grunts and screams and the whole thing recycling itself over and again... It’s just such a wonderful song. I could listen to it all day. And then it ends, and out of nowhere it launches into the "Please, Please, Please" medley, a thunderstorm of hot and sweaty R&B. A+, James Brown and the Famous Flames. A+ indeed.
The sense of springing forward while standing still that I mentioned earlier is actually a part of what makes this album so great. Knowing what we know about Brown, the expectation is that things will get funky at some time or another. And, in fact, the whole rhythmic foundation of the band sounds like it’s on the verge of making the jump into on-the-one and break beats. But it never comes. And by the end of the album, which is only thirty-five minutes long, you’re left dazzled and energised with nowhere to go but back into the album again.
This is a truly wonderful record. In fact, I might even say that it’s better than Sam Cooke’s. I didn’t think that at first – in fact, on the first listen I considered it kind of so-so. Now, however, I’d regard it as a masterpiece of passionate concision. James Brown was a master showman, and this album is a collection of perfect songs, performed faultlessly and in exactly the right sequence. This isn’t a showy album – it doesn’t slap you in the face with its brilliance. It just quietly sidles in behind you when you’re not looking and then proceeds to kick your arse.
If you are reading this and you haven't heard this album, then drop what you are doing and acquire it at once.
9.5/10.
Download: James Brown - Lost Someone (Live at the Apollo) mp3
Friday, April 3, 2009
39. Charles Mingus - The Black Saint and The Sinner Man (1963)
Tracklist: Solo Dancer // Duet Solo Dancers // Group Dancers // Trio and Group Dancers
Review:
Ladies and gentlemen, this is just damned imposing. See also: impressive, impassion, and impossible. It's not an album, it's a monument. That this whole thing was actually composed – that somewhere, out there, there are charts for this thing – is simply baffling beyond believe; much easier to believe that it poured-out of some chink in the fabric of reality. In fact, I bet this is what Cthulhu listens to when he’s relaxing at home. But of course, it was written down, and arranged, and rehearsed, and yes it was even played – by Charles Mingus, no less, supergreat jazz-dude and the man I’d most like to buy a drink for (if I had a time machine).
The Clown was the first jazz album I ever heard. I downloaded it along with John Coltrane’s A Love Supreme, after someone starting asking people to choose between the two albums in a thread about “Haitian Fight Song”. Well, I sided with The Clown, and since then I’ve never looked back. Something about Mingus’ music just sort of clicked with me – like Jaki Liebezeit’s drumming, the Fiery Furnaces’ ADD-fuelled story-telling collages, or VU-inspired lunatic guitar-terrorism, it just seems like the perfect soundtrack to the human mind. This seems appropriate, given the album’s origins. Charles Mingus was a famously unstable man, and he not only spent time in a New York mental hospital prior to writing this album, but had his psychiatrist contribute to the liner notes. The album itself is actually a ballet, written as a sort of insight into the nature of Mingus’ manic-depressive mind. The result is a schizophrenic tempest of Latin guitars, swing-rhythms, careening trumpets, lyrical piano passages, pummelling drums, pulsing bass, and turn-on-a-dime tonal shifts; an album that’s simply awe-inspiring in its complexity, emotional effectiveness and raw, unhinged beauty.
The most impressive thing about this album is probably that it isn’t actually an album, in the traditional sense. Rather than being a collection of songs, “The Black Saint and the Sinner Lady” is actually a single coherent composition, complete with recurring phrases and a sort-of narrative build. At the same time, Mingus seems to have conceived of the thing as a recording project, and unlike most jazz albums of the time The Black Saint... actually makes extensive use of sophisticated studio techniques such as overdubbing, editing, and the mixing-in of new elements. Mingus was one of the finest writers to ever work in jazz, and the combination of his prodigious compositional ability, the virtuosity of the assembled players (who were given freedom to refine their parts even further in rehearsals), and the meticulous approach afforded by the recording studio all combine to produce what is simultaneously one of the most elaborate and the tightest albums ever produced. Hell, forget albums – I’d go so far as to argue that this is one of the finest things anyone ever composed, period. Which is appropriate given that Mingus (who was not always the humblest of men) self-consciously constructed the thing as his defining masterwork. How often does that actually succeed? Not nearly often enough.
It’s a masterpiece, really. It sways from beauty, to terror, and round about along every possible feeling in between. Put it loud on a stereo, lie down to listen, and I bet you won’t move for the next three quarters of an hour. Mingus knew how to apply good writing to the evocation of a mood, and in this album he conjured-up every mood you’d ever care to feel, and he guides you through them like Virgil through Hades to the glorious madness of the conclusion. This is what the world would sound like if you captured it in a bottle, with all the hope and horror that such entails. Perfect.
A+
Download: Charles Mingus - Trio Dancers mp3
(although really you should listen to this in its entirety.
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
38 - Sam Cooke - Live At The Harlem Square Club 1963
Tracklist: Feel It//Chain Gang//Cupid//Medley: It's All Right - For Sentimental Reasons//Twisting the Night Away//Somebody Have Mercy//Bring It On Home to Me//Nothing Can Change This Love//Having A Party
Review:
Oh fuck this. I didn’t pay cash money for a copy of Aqualung just so that I could abandon this thirty-four albums in. No, that’s an act that takes a toll on your soul... A life time of repentance lies before me.
Speaking of soul, here we have what just might be the first full-on soul album on the list. It’s a little bit country, it’s a little bit rock... It’s also fucking incredible. You may notice I’m swearing a lot more, also. I find that the speed with which I complete these reviews is directly proportional to how much shame I would feel in letting my grandma read them. In any case, this album deserves praise conveyable only by the use of profanities. It just might the best live album anyone ever did ever. Leastways, I can’t imagine it being possible to ever do much better.
Anyway, Sam Cooke is playing at the Harlem Square Club, and appropriately enough he sounds like a total square. He’s got a speaking voice to make a high school mathematics teacher look cool. What’s amazing is that he’s also a bloody incredible singing voice. He manages to blend the throaty quality of guys like Little Richard or Otis Redding with a technical polish and rhythmic sense largely alien to those other (admittedly still pretty great) artists. All of which would mean shit if he didn’t also have an incredible backing band, pumping-out a soulful – and I do mean honest-to-god soulful – mix of stomping rhythms, crooning horns and bouncy, bouncy basslines. The result is what just might be the most joyful, beautiful album I’ve ever heard. He comes out, the crowd goes wild, and it doesn't let-up for 38 glorious minutes.
I’d always suspected that Cooke was good, what with songs like “Cupid” and “A Change Is Gonna Come”, but as great as those tracks are they’re also kind of syrupy and over-produced. I tend to like music that’s syrupy and over-produced, but here the general raw ambience of the live setting, contrasted with the sweetness of the music, produces the perfect mix. Add to this Cooke working the audience like a born showman, making little asides to the audience between (and even during) songs, coaxing them to sing along and the like. This is one of those albums where the live audience is just as important as the star players – hell, they sing most of the words on “I Love You For Sentimental Reasons”. And I can’t imagine “Having A Party” being anywhere near as good without the chorus of worshipful female fans. Or the "Hoo! Hah!" grunting on "Chain Gang".. The guy came out of church music, pioneering the singing of secular Gospel, and it only makes sense that he’d be brilliant at stage-front exhortations and the conjuring of the overwhelmingly uplifting. I mean, this is an album where the ballads are just as rocking and wonderful as the actual rockers! And the flow of the show is masterful, starting with a killer batch of fist-pumpers, then lulling a bit, and closing on the anthemic (and aptly-titled) "Having A Party". Not that the music is at all "churchy". In fact, "raw, blinding sexuality" might be a better description. It may sound a cliché to say it, but I would kill a man to be able to go back in time and attend this concert.
So, do you feel like you wanna twist awhile? I said, DO YA WANNA TWIST AWHILE!? Pass the handkerchief around! I said pass the handkerchief around! Cause I don’t know if you can hear me, but if feels good to twist the night away. I said it sure feels good when you’ve got someone to twist the night away with.
Unfortunately, Sam Cooke died pretty soon after this, in deeply peculiar circumstances. The varying reports of how he came to be gunned down in a motel office are “In A Grove”-like in their interlocking complexities. I can’t say I’ve felt a lasting regret about this, since I only know two of his songs outside of this album, and this album is something I've only just become acquainted with, but it’s really a real pity, really, in any case. This is just astonishing.
9/10
Thursday, January 22, 2009
37. Phil Spector & Various Artists - A Christmas Gift to You from Phil Spector (1963)
Tracks: White Christmas//Frosty the Snowman//The Bells of St. Mary's//Santa Clause is Coming to Town//Sleigh Ride//Marshmallow World//I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus//Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer//Winter Wonderland//Parade of the Wooden Soldiers//Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)//Here Comes Santa Clause//Silent Night
For an Antipodean, the iconography of Christmas can be quite puzzling. Every year, in the midst of summer, the streets are draped with those cut-out snow flakes and Father Christmas prances about in snowscapes on TV. I'll wander into a supermarket and hear "White Christmas" coming over the PA, but unless I'm feeling particularly confrontational I generally won't give it that much thought. But the fact remains that it's High Summer in December here in Australia, and still we cling to things like reindeer and winter wonderlands despite the absolute lack of relevance to our culture. I suppose we interact with the more wintry aspects of Christmas in the same way that most people associate with the Holy Land, but it still seems faintly ridiculous each year when November rolls round and the fake frost starts gracing the storefront windows.
This acceptance of an alien Christmas experience is actually typical of much Australian culture. Essentially a Western enclave tacked-on to the bottom of the Far East, we've never really embraced either our neighbours or our peculiar lot. Almost everyone here is either an immigrant or the child of an immigrant, associating themselves with their mother countries, and those that are "Australian" many generations deep tend to cling tightly to whatever their original stock was - be it English, Scots, German or Czech. The result is a country that tends to live outside of itself to a considerable extent, simultaneously fiercly proud of its local culture and deeply insecure about how it is perceived by the rest of the world. If I could sum-up my perception of the Australian condition in a few words, it would be of a group of children who have been sent-off to a Summer camp and are enjoying themselves a great deal, but at the same time are waiting desperately to be allowed to go back home to their mothers.
I suppose it's something Americans feel too, this idea that their country is something of a sham - just a reflection in a cheap mirror of the genuine Old World. But Americans have had so long to create a history for themselves, and have such a powerful mythic foundation built on the very idea of their newness and self-conscious self-differation from the Old World, that they ride this out quite well. In short, they've decided they're better than Europe, and they've set-about proving it. Australia, by contrast, is deeply conscious of how short it falls in comparison to its perceptions of the US and Europe, and has tried to cover this up with a great deal of hollow bravado. The best example of this is our incessant desire to go off and stick our noses in the business of others, fighting in wars that don't have much to do with us and consistently trying to bat above our weight (Kylie Minogue is another good example, I suppose). America did this too, and had the resources to pull it off - except, apparently, in competitive soccer. Meanwhile Australia is a tiny country, and we're more like the child who gets excited over winning a merit award at primary school, not realising that every other child gets one too.
The point of all of this, arriving in my long and ponderous way, is that I have never ridden in a sleigh but I have worn shorts outside on Boxing Day (though not boxers, regrettably). I also like Christmas music too, although being an Australian atheist it has about as much relevance to me as an Israeli cattle shed has to a full-blooded Welshman.
So, having said I like Christmas music the question now arises of whether or not I like this particular Christmas music. The answer is... it's OK I guess. The problems that beset this collection are the same as those that crop-up in any Christmas album - you have some very fine and enjoyable tunes done badly, some very bad tunes done finely, and some good songs done great. So while this means that things are largely par for the course, there are a few elements to this album that help to lift its game.
The first is, most obviously, Phil Spector. General consensus holds that Spector is batshit insane (evidence to support this ranges from minor eccentricities like having musicians sit-in silent on recording sessions for fear that their absence would change the sound of the room, to more grandiose lunancy such as locking Ronnie Spector away for months in his house or forcing the Ramones to repeat their parts ad infinitum at gun point), but be that as it may he did provide a number of vital contributions to popular music - namely, girl groups and the Wall of Sound. Now I'm not saying he invented the former, but he just might be able to claim credit on the latter, or at least that's what rock historians always say.
The Phil Spector "Wall of Sound" was actually a pretty simple thing. Spector had an enormous echo-chamber set-up, with angles and planes abounding within it so skewed as to make R'lyeh look like Bauhaus. This was Gold Star, his one-of-a-kind studio, and a lot of his productions (or at least the backing tracks - I can't recall precisely) were recorded more or less live in the studio. Everything would echo around and the glorious, suffocating harmonic reverberations created, well, a massive wall of sound. It was a bit thin, really, in terms of the equalizing, but damned if it didn't sound great blaring out in mono. The pinnacle of this sort of thing is probably "River Deep, Mountain High", on which Spector asembled a massive orchestra including multiple bass-players, conga drummers and banks of electric guitarists - although some people (myself being one of them) think that he was permanently one-upped in this by the release of My Blood Valentine's Loveless twenty-odd years later. Then again, maybe Brian Wilson managed it only a couple of years on - he had a more sophisticated set-up consisting of a closed-off metal echo chamber with a speaker at one end and microphones strung along its length to pick-up the different levels of reverb as the soundwaves traveled down the tunnel. This meant that Wilson could pump a single track of audio through the chamber, listen to the different pick-ups to find the exact sound he wanted, and then record the treated track and mix it back down into the finished recording at whatever level he wanted. Compared to this, Spector was basically just getting a bunch of guys together to yell loudly in a public toilet.
Anyway, it worked, so there's that. It also more or less came to typify Spectors sound until he became something of a one-trick pony, but then who cares if you only know one trick as long as it's a good trick. And besides, the Wall of Sound is especially useful for Christmas songs since it manages to make damned near everything sound like it's happening inside of a snowstorm.
The other big plus to this album is that, in addition to wonderful covers like Darlene Love's "White Christmas", the Ronette's "Frosty the Snowman" with trademark throaty vocals, and the Crystals' explosive rendition of "Santa Claus is Coming to Town", you also get a truly great original in the form of the sublime "Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)". It's really just a big tidal wave of yearning, but the hook is glorious and Darlene Love provides a truly beautiful soul vocal. It's really one of my very favourite songs, and one of the few Christmas tunes that I feel like listening to all through the year (the other is Julie London's "I'd Like You for Christmas", if you really must know).
Unfortunately while there are exceptional songs here a lot of the other material is just sort of "there", if you sass me. And then there's the problem that most of the good songs here have both been played to death every single year since their release, and thoroughly ripped-off in terms of sound and style by seemingly every single hack R&B singer to even so much as glance at a microphone. It's infuriating! And then there's Spector's fantastically ill-advised voice-overs in which he thanks everyone for buying his album... Best to say as little of those as possible. And I've not even touched on the fact that ninety percent of Christmas music is just vapid novelty numbers anyway.
In any event, while this is a good album, I think the main thing that it proves is that Philles records should have just stuck to singles like they apparently seem, for the most part, to have done. It's kind of funny that despite being one of only twelve long-players they put-out it mostly just seems like an over-extended vehicle for its stand-out single. In fact, this is probably the real reason that this album is here - Spector's early work is massively influential, and this provides just about the only chance in LP format to examine it undiluted, even though anyone being honest with themselves would instead recommend a singles compilation of some kind.
So, in a word: a great Christmas album but a somewhat scattershot LP.
7.5/10
Download: Darlene Love - Christmas (Baby Please Come Home) Mp3